Soon :-) For Malhar master branch is now also the target for new pull requests. Given the large number of outstanding PRs I suggest we allow for some time to complete them against the devel-3 branch and then merge from there to master.
Would be great if authors can close those PRs that are not actively being worked on. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:53 PM, David Yan <[email protected]> wrote: > We should celebrate :) > On Jan 29, 2016 3:37 PM, "Thomas Weise" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Gone, we can put it back if there is strong demand for it :-) > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Aniruddha Thombare < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think devel-3 should be removed to avoid any confusions WRT master / > > > devel-3. > > > > > > Accidental / forgetful PRs can be avoided by removing devel-3. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Aniruddha > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I created the release-3.3 branch in core and set master to be the > > branch > > > > for development with 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT version. All current and stale > PRs > > > are > > > > closed with this push. There were only 3 PRs actively being worked on > > and > > > > new PRs need to be opened against master: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/208 > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/207 > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/194 > > > > > > > > Anyone wants to keep devel-3 around? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Vlad Rozov < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I guess plan to change to master as part of branching for 3.3.x > > applies > > > > to > > > > > core. Do we plan to make the same change to malhar at the same time > > or > > > > > while branching for 3.4? How do we handle existing open pull > > requests? > > > > Will > > > > > it be committer responsibility to merge them to the master branch > > > instead > > > > > of devel-3? Do we plan to keep devel-3 around for some time or will > > > > delete > > > > > it once it is merged into the master? > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > Vlad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/25/16 11:43, Thomas Weise wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Looks like there is strong backing to move development to master > as > > > the > > > > >> default branch. > > > > >> > > > > >> I would suggest to make this change along with branching for > 3.3.x. > > > > >> > > > > >> Thomas > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Bhupesh Chawda < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 for master branch for development > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -Bhupesh > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Sasha Parfenov < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> +1 for primary development on master branch. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>> Sasha > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Sunday, January 24, 2016, Shubham Pathak < > > > [email protected]> > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> +1 for master branch as the default development branch. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>> Shubham > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Chandni Singh < > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> [email protected] > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> <javascript:;>> > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> +1 for master being the development branch > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Yogi Devendra < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> [email protected] > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> <javascript:;>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> If you decide the make such change; please create an action > item > > > to > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> do > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> necessary changes in all documentation which refers to devel-3. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> From the documentation perspective, master would be better > > than > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> devel-3. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Because, master will remain master forever (If we decide not > to > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> change > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> it > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> yet another time). But, devel-3 will need to be eventually > > > replaced > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> by > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> devel-4 at some time in future. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> +1 for master (from the ease of maintaining documentation > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> perspective) > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> ~ Yogi > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> On 22 January 2016 at 15:05, Priyanka Gugale < > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> [email protected] > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> <javascript:;>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> +1 for master branch. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> -Priyanka > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Timothy Farkas < > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> [email protected] > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> <javascript:;>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> +1 for master branch being the default development branch. > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>>>>>> Tim > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Sandeep Deshmukh < > > > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for master branch as default master branch. That makes > it > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> consistent > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> with what most of the other projects are following and will > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> have > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> a > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> smooth > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> experience for new users and contributors than getting into > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> another > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> branch > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> like devel-3. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sandeep > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Tushar Gosavi < > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for using default branch for active development. > devel-3 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> if > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> it > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> can > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> be > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> made default or master. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> We already saw developer opening pull request against > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> master > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> ( > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/146) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> and we had to specifically tell them open pull request > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> against > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> devel-3. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Using default branch will reduce such confusion. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -Tushar. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for switching trunk development to master for both > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> APEXCORE > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> APEXMALHAR. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I understand that current master has stable/tested > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> of > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> apex. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> And > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> we > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would lose that if trunk development happens on master. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hence, to point to last stable/tested version for apex, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> would > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> it > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> make > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> sense > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to add a section about that in README.md? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure if other Apache projects follow this way. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> So, > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> this > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> is > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> just a > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> proposal. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Chinmay. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Vlad Rozov < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll vote for all the trunk development being done on > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> default > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> branch. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> If there is a way to mark devel-3 as default, it will > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> as > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> good > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> as > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> switching all trunk development to the master branch > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> that > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> is > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> currently > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> default. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/21/16 17:08, Thomas Weise wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> That will also work but master is not needed for > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> released > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> versions. > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Releases are tags and typically used through the Maven > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies. > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> People coming to github are typically contributors and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> they > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> should > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> see > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> latest stable code. When we merge changes into > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> devel-3, > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> they > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> have > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> been > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> reviewed and tested, we cut the release branches from > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> devel-3. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> This > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> is > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> what > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be visible by default. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once we do major changes, we will need to do those on > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> another > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> branch. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Making changes for next major release 4.x is one such > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> in > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> my > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> mind. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Sandesh Hegde < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about we just keep "devel"? and master continues > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> be > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> released > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> version. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:55 PM Vlad Rozov < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I remember correctly the idea behind using master > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> devel-3/devel-4 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> was to use devel-3 and devel-4 for trunks on 3.x and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.x > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> and > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> use > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> master > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> as the latest released version. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not proposing to use master one way or another, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> stating > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> my > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> understanding behind the current configuration of > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Apex > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> core > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> malhar branches. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/21/16 15:18, Thomas Weise wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It my be possible but I would question why. The > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> branch > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> does > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> serve any other purpose, so why not use it for > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Vlad Rozov < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess not, I think that we don't have admin > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> to > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> manage > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> apex > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> core > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or malhar mirrors on github. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/21/16 14:12, Pramod Immaneni wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can't we set a default branch in the repo to be > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> from > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> master? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:04 PM, David Yan < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have been using the devel-3 branch for > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> in > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> both > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Apex > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Core > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apex Malhar. The reason was that we wanted to > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> master > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> branch > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point to the latest release so that when a user > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checks > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> out > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> from > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> our > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> git > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo, it's always the latest source release and it > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> works. > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> But on the other hand, from what I see, that is > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> what > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> most > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> active > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> apache > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects do. I checked Flink, Spark, Storm, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Samza, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Pig, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Hive, > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hadoop, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ALL of these projects have commits on the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> branch > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> that > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> are > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most one day old. Apex Core on the other hand, > the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> commit > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> on > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master branch was Nov, 2015, and that was when we > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Apex > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Core > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 3.2.0. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because of our stale master branch, it's easy > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> someone > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> outside > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apex community to conclude that Apex is not very > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> active > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> compared > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> to > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> other > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache projects. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To me, the benefits of using the devel-3 branch > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> simply > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> not > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> worth > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> potential cost. I would like to propose that we > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> rid > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> of > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> devel-3 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch and use the master branch for development, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> of > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> having > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master branch always reflecting the latest > release. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> use > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> tags > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> for > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> that > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share your thoughts. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -- > > > > >>> Regards, > > > > >>> Bhupesh Chawda > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
