Isn't operator the entity that performs the actual work/task? I don't think so. Operator is an abstraction for business logic. It is not the class with the main method. The main class here is the StreamingContainer which will executes the business logic provided in the operator.
Chandni On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Ashwin Chandra Putta < [email protected]> wrote: > Isn't operator the entity that performs the actual work/task? From what I > know, the StreamingContainer is more of a handler of operators within the > container. > > Regards, > Ashwin. > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > How about calling StreamingContainer as > ApexWorkerHandler/ApexWorkerManager > > as it is possible that there can be multiple operators within a container > > and each operator by itself is a worker. > > > > IMO an operator is not a worker. At least we haven't been calling it a > > 'Worker' so far. > > Apex worker corresponds to a child container and can run multiple > operators > > if that is the case. > > > > Chandni > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Ashwin Chandra Putta < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 for ApexAppMaster. > > > > > > How about calling StreamingContainer as > > ApexWorkerHandler/ApexWorkerManager > > > as it is possible that there can be multiple operators within a > container > > > and each operator by itself is a worker. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ashwin. > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:51 PM, David Yan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for "Apex Worker". > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Chandni Singh < > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > How about renaming them to Apex App Master, and Apex Worker > > Container? > > > > > I think just Apex Worker is sufficient if we make this change. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Thomas Weise < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I like the suggestion. Can we record it in JIRA for the next > major > > > > > release? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:52 PM, David Yan <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Today, in both our doc and our code, we use the name STRAM > > > (STReaming > > > > > App > > > > > > > Master) for the App Master, and StreamingContainer (previously > > > known > > > > as > > > > > > > StramChild) for the worker containers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But since STRAM is running in a container itself, calling the > > > worker > > > > > > > containers StreamingContainer is not exactly ideal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about renaming them to Apex App Master, and Apex Worker > > > > Container? > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ashwin. > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > Ashwin. >
