They are unique but you should not make assumptions about the sequence.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> By default, are the IDs returned by getId() method sequential like 0..(N-1)
> where there are N instances of the operator or these IDs are some unique
> numbers?
>
> Regards,
> Sandeep
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > You can also assign a custom ID or other any other per-partition
> properties
> > in the partitioner.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Ashwin Chandra Putta <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Use the getId() method in OperatorContext.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.datatorrent.com/docs/apidocs/com/datatorrent/api/Context.OperatorContext.html#getId()
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ashwin.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Ganelin, Ilya <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Given that any single logical operator may have multiple physical
> > > > partitions, is there any way for an operator to know something akin
> to
> > a
> > > > partition ID? E.g. part0, part1, etc.
> > > > ________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
> > > > proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
> > > > solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
> > > information
> > > > transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or
> > entity
> > > > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the
> > > intended
> > > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> > > > dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of
> any
> > > > action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If
> you
> > > > have received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > and
> > > > delete the material from your computer.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ashwin.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to