Hi, JFYI It's more common to call bylaws guidelines theses days.
> A committer will be considered > “emeritus/inactive” by not contributing in any form to the > project for > over 1 year. This is a little unusual and you may want to discuss this further. One of the principals of the Apache Way is merit once earned is never lost.[1] > +Commit access can be revoked by a unanimous vote of all the active PMC > members While this is unlikely to happen, (and I hope it never does) getting all PMC members to vote may prove too difficult. > +* Deciding what is distributed as products of the project. In particular > all releases must be approved by the PMC I’d add "voted on and approved”. Note that release votes can’t be vetoed (i.e. a single valid -1 doesn’t stop voting) and only require 3 +1’s and more +1 than -1s, this may need to added. > Membership of the > PMC can be revoked by an unanimous vote of all the active PMC members other > than > the member in question. Again it’s unlikely and hope this never happens but it would be very hard to get all PMC members to vote. Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#committer-set-term
