Github user chinmaykolhatkar commented on a diff in the pull request:

    
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/211#discussion_r57845120
  
    --- Diff: 
contrib/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/contrib/avro/AvroToPojo.java ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,415 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
    + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
    + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
    + * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
    + * specific language governing permissions and limitations
    + * under the License.
    + */
    +package com.datatorrent.contrib.avro;
    +
    +import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream;
    +import java.io.IOException;
    +import java.io.ObjectOutputStream;
    +import java.util.ArrayList;
    +import java.util.List;
    +import java.util.StringTokenizer;
    +
    +import org.slf4j.Logger;
    +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
    +
    +import org.apache.avro.AvroRuntimeException;
    +import org.apache.avro.generic.GenericRecord;
    +import org.apache.commons.lang3.ClassUtils;
    +import org.apache.hadoop.classification.InterfaceStability;
    +
    +import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
    +
    +import com.datatorrent.api.AutoMetric;
    +import com.datatorrent.api.Context;
    +import com.datatorrent.api.Context.PortContext;
    +import com.datatorrent.api.DefaultInputPort;
    +import com.datatorrent.api.DefaultOutputPort;
    +import com.datatorrent.api.annotation.InputPortFieldAnnotation;
    +import com.datatorrent.api.annotation.OutputPortFieldAnnotation;
    +import com.datatorrent.common.util.BaseOperator;
    +import com.datatorrent.lib.util.FieldInfo;
    +import com.datatorrent.lib.util.FieldInfo.SupportType;
    +import com.datatorrent.lib.util.PojoUtils;
    +
    +/**
    + * <p>
    + * AvroToPojo
    + * </p>
    + * A generic implementation for conversion from Avro to POJO. The POJO 
class
    + * name & field mapping should be provided by the user. If this mapping is 
not
    + * provided then reflection is used to determine this mapping. As of now 
only
    + * primitive types are supported.
    + *
    + * @displayName Avro To Pojo
    + * @category Converter
    + * @tags avro
    + * @since 3.3.0
    + */
    +@InterfaceStability.Evolving
    +public class AvroToPojo extends BaseOperator
    +{
    +
    +  private Class<?> cls;
    +
    +  private static final String FIELD_SEPARATOR = ":";
    +  private static final String RECORD_SEPARATOR = ",";
    +
    +  private String genericRecordToPOJOFieldsMapping = null;
    +
    +  private List<FieldInfo> fieldInfos;
    +
    +  private List<ActiveFieldInfo> columnFieldSetters = null;
    +
    +  @AutoMetric
    +  int recordCnt = 0;
    +
    +  @AutoMetric
    +  int errorCnt = 0;
    +
    +  @AutoMetric
    +  int fieldErrorCnt = 0;
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Retruns a string representing mapping from generic record to POJO 
fields
    +   */
    +  public String getGenericRecordToPOJOFieldsMapping()
    +  {
    +    return genericRecordToPOJOFieldsMapping;
    +  }
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Comma separated list mapping a field in Avro schema to POJO field eg :
    +   * orderId:orderId:INTEGER
    +   */
    +  public void setGenericRecordToPOJOFieldsMapping(String 
genericRecordToPOJOFieldsMapping)
    +  {
    +    this.genericRecordToPOJOFieldsMapping = 
genericRecordToPOJOFieldsMapping;
    +  }
    +
    +  @InputPortFieldAnnotation(optional = false)
    +  public final transient DefaultInputPort<GenericRecord> data = new 
DefaultInputPort<GenericRecord>()
    +  {
    +    @Override
    +    public void process(GenericRecord tuple)
    +    {
    +      processTuple(tuple);
    +    }
    +  };
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Converts given Generic Record and to a POJO and emits it
    +   */
    +  protected void processTuple(GenericRecord tuple)
    +  {
    +    try {
    +      Object obj = getPOJOFromGenericRecord(tuple, getCls());
    +
    +      if (obj != null) {
    +        output.emit(obj);
    +        recordCnt++;
    +      }
    +
    +    } catch (InstantiationException | IllegalAccessException e) {
    +      LOG.error("Could not initialize object of class - " + 
getClass().getName());
    +      errorCnt++;
    +    }
    +  }
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Returns a POJO from a Generic Record
    +   * 
    +   * @return Object
    +   */
    +  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    +  private Object getPOJOFromGenericRecord(GenericRecord tuple, Class<?> 
cls)
    +      throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException
    +  {
    +    Object newObj = getCls().newInstance();
    +
    +    try {
    +      for (int i = 0; i < columnFieldSetters.size(); i++) {
    +
    +        AvroToPojo.ActiveFieldInfo afi = columnFieldSetters.get(i);
    +        afi = columnFieldSetters.get(i);
    +        SupportType st = afi.fieldInfo.getType();
    +        Object val = null;
    +
    +        try {
    +          val = tuple.get(afi.fieldInfo.getColumnName());
    +        } catch (Exception e) {
    +          LOG.error("Could not find field -" + 
afi.fieldInfo.getColumnName() + "- in the generic record");
    +          val = null;
    +          fieldErrorCnt++;
    +        }
    +
    +        if (val == null) {
    +          continue;
    +        }
    +
    +        try {
    +          switch (st) {
    +            case BOOLEAN:
    +              
((PojoUtils.SetterBoolean<Object>)afi.setterOrGetter).set(newObj,
    +                  (boolean)tuple.get(afi.fieldInfo.getColumnName()));
    +              break;
    +
    +            case DOUBLE:
    +              
((PojoUtils.SetterDouble<Object>)afi.setterOrGetter).set(newObj,
    +                  (double)tuple.get(afi.fieldInfo.getColumnName()));
    +              break;
    +
    +            case FLOAT:
    +              
((PojoUtils.SetterFloat<Object>)afi.setterOrGetter).set(newObj,
    +                  (float)tuple.get(afi.fieldInfo.getColumnName()));
    +              break;
    +
    +            case INTEGER:
    +              ((PojoUtils.SetterInt<Object>)afi.setterOrGetter).set(newObj,
    +                  (int)tuple.get(afi.fieldInfo.getColumnName()));
    +              break;
    +
    +            case STRING:
    +              ((PojoUtils.Setter<Object, 
String>)afi.setterOrGetter).set(newObj,
    +                  new 
String(tuple.get(afi.fieldInfo.getColumnName()).toString()));
    --- End diff --
    
    new String(<getfield>).toString() shouldn't be needed? Isn't it? You could 
just do <getfield>


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to