IMO this is not a good idea.

We are proposing to add additional Java code which is generic (works with
HDFS, NFS, local FS) but just calling it something specific - NFS. IMO this
is much more confusing to users.

If we want to make it easier for users to find out that the FS Module
supports writing to NFS then maybe we need to improve documentation or
highlight it somewhere else.

Adding java classes means more maintenance overhead and here these classes
are not doing anything additional.

Thanks,
Chandni





On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Mohit Jotwani <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 on Sandeep's suggestion. This would make an end user's life lot more
> easier!
>
> Regards,
> Mohit
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I do agree with Amol on having clear and explicit modules. This is more
> > from an end user perspective. For someone who is new to Apex, having
> > separate NFS, HDFS, FTP, etc would make lot more sense than one generic
> FS
> > module. However small change these modules may have, like just couple of
> > small functions, I would like to have them separate for the end user.
> >
> > It is finally about the perspective and the user experience :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sandeep
> >
> > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think we should name something NFS* when it isn't specific to
> > NFS.
> > > It is just like any other local FS for this purpose and that's already
> > > covered by the Hadoop file system abstraction.
> > >
> > > Why can't a single FS Input module accommodate all of this. Once you
> know
> > > the FS URL, you can automatically optimize the configuration, if
> > > appropriate.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Chaitanya Chebolu <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Chandni,
> > > >
> > > >   Its a good point. I created the hierarchy based on user perspective
> > and
> > > > especially for non Java users. If I return FileSplitter and
> BlockReader
> > > > from FS Input Module, then this module works for NFS. But, for users
> > > > perspective it would be difficult, whether this module works for NFS
> or
> > > any
> > > > other fileSystem.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Chaitanya
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Chandni Singh <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am sorry Chaitanya but I have more questions about this
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. why is the FS Input Module abstract when by default it can
> return
> > > > > FileSplitter & BlockReader in com.datatorrent.lib.io.fs?
> > > > >  These implementations are not specific to NFS.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. In the NFS module that you have suggested to create, what is
> > > specific
> > > > to
> > > > > NFS?
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note: I have created a ticket APEXMALHAR-2081 to remove
> > > > > FSFileSplitter from library and move its feature to the base
> > operator.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Chandni
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Chaitanya Chebolu <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > FSFileSplitter & BlockReader are available in
> > > com.datatorrent.lib.io.fs
> > > > > > package.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Chandni Singh <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ok. What is specific about the fileSplitter and blockReader
> > > returned
> > > > by
> > > > > > > this implementation?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On May 4, 2016 9:43 PM, "Chaitanya Chebolu" <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Chandni,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Properties wise nothing specific. FS Input Module is an
> > abstract
> > > > > Module
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > NFS Module implements the abstract methods -
> > createFileSplitter()
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > createBlockReader().
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Chaitanya
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Chandni Singh <
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Chaitanya,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What will be specific in NFS Input Module that is not
> > provided
> > > by
> > > > > FS
> > > > > > > > Input
> > > > > > > > > Module?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Chandni
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Amol Kekre <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thks
> > > > > > > > > > Amol
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh <
> > > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > Sandeep
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Mohit Jotwani <
> > > > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mohit
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Chaitanya Chebolu <
> > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   I am proposing NFS Input Module. Use case is to
> > read
> > > > > large
> > > > > > > > files
> > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > NFS
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in parallel.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >  Design of NFS input module:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >    There is a common interface "FSInputModule" in
> > > Malhar
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > input
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Modules. NFS input Module extends from
> FSInputModule
> > > and
> > > > > can
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > achieved
> > > > > > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > using FSFileSplitter and BlockReader operators.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   Please share your thoughts on this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Chaitanya
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to