Hello Frank, On Monday 29 June 2009, 07:43, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > Hi, > > would adding a method to an existing published interface be considered > too incompatible for a 3.2 release? > > In particular, css.awt.XView has a method setZoom, but not a getZoom, > which I'd like to add. I could create a crutch called XView2, deriving > from XView, having only this one said method. However, it would lead to > a better API (IMO), if we would simply add the method to XView. > > Now XView is "published", but did't we say that there's a certain type > of incompatible API changes which we should consider to allow for > non-major OOo releases?
was there an agreement on that? I didn't have time to understand the reasons given for adding a FilterOperator2, carrying with it a TableFilterField2 and a XSheetFilterDescriptor2; but the names just tell me there was no agreement. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
