Hi, On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Juergen Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > if we can all agree i would suggest that we don't change the code back. > > The correct way will work with older versions of OOo as well and the code > have to be changed in the near future anyway. > > What's your opinion? I can also live with Michaels suggestion to implement > this interface until OOo 4.0 but it's probably easier and better to change > the code now as later and potentially forget it.
Since our (and potentially a lot of other) extension breaks with this change this is a major issue that prevents us from rolling out OOo 3.2. Reverting the change until OOo 4.0 would give us enough time to update our extension and roll out the updated version. So I support Michael's suggestion to re-implement the interfaces that are missing, at least temporary, and document the change so that people are aware of the issue and can adapt their macros/extensions. Regards, Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
