On 04/29/10 11:38, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
One comment from me, i wouldn't use the protocol name
"vnd.sun.star.extension://<extension_identifier>/...."
I would prefer something like
"vnd.ooo.extension://<extension_identifier>/...."
or
"vnd.oxt://<extension_identifier>/...."
The vnd.sun.XXX URL schemes were based on draft-king-vnd-urlscheme-00
(implicitly, to my knowledge, assuming that "sun" would be an
appropriate vendor-ID). That draft has by now been superseded by
draft-king-vnd-urlscheme-03 (and no idea whether this has made the step
from draft to RFC, or ever will make it), changing the syntax (which
would now look like vnd-sun-XXX instead).
So, the best bet would be to either stay with our prior art and use
vnd.sun.star.extension or follow draft-king-vnd-urlscheme-03 and use
something like vnd-ooo-extension or vnd-openofficeorg-extension.
-Stephan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
