So can I safely assume that there is no version of OOo that can run on Linux 
without X Windows running at the same time?



Hal



On Jul 22, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Hal Vaughan wrote:

> This isn't exactly right under API, but it's for more advanced and 
> programming use, so I think this is probably the best group for these 
> questions.
> 
> I have a small business and have been using OpenOffice in it for a while.  I 
> generate reports for my clients with data that I process.  On their computers 
> (which are usually running Windows), I have a Java program that loads OOo in 
> a headless instance to generate and print out the reports.
> 
> For a number of reasons, I'm thinking of changing my setup to something less 
> centralized for me.  This would involve buying embedded systems from Soekris 
> and putting one in each client's office.  (I know this sounds expensive, but 
> there are many solid reasons for this.)  I can run Linux, specifically Debian 
> Linux, on these embedded systems.
> 
> In the past, I was experimenting with a Linux box that had only the command 
> line system and no X windows, but OOo used the X font server, so there was no 
> way I could run a headless instance of OOo to print out documents unless X 
> was there and, if I remember, X had to be running as well.
> 
> Is it possible to run OOo, now, on Linux, without having to have X on the 
> same system?  If it's on there, does it have to be running, or just there so 
> OOo can use the libraries needed?  It'd be just great, for me, if there were 
> a way to run OOo on an embedded Linux system without needing X or any of the 
> assorted files there or running.
> 
> Also, there's another problem that's similar.  Whenever I run any word 
> processor on different computers, there's always the chance that each 
> computer could be using slightly different fonts.  Sometimes a document I 
> write on one computer that takes up 1 page will, on another computer, be one 
> page with a line or two on the next page.  The formatting can change from 
> computer to computer.
> 
> This is a problem because along with reports, I generate cover letters.  Of 
> course, if the client has formatted a report for one page, I need it to print 
> on just one page.  As for cover letters, I have to be sure the address will 
> always be in the same place.
> 
> That leads to my second question.  I have used Linux and OS X before, on my 
> own LAN, and used X Windows and ssh with forwarding so I can run a program 
> like OOo on one computer, but have the display show on another computer.  
> However, when I do this, there are often issues with fonts and display size. 
> The windows don't look quite the same on the client system as they do on the 
> server system, when I run it directly on the server.
> 
> Is there some way to set up a server instance of OOo that can be run, across 
> the network, so a user can access that server version of OOo on another 
> computer and be sure they're looking at a window and display that shows the 
> document on the client computer exactly as it will be printed if, at some 
> later date, it's printed from the server computer?
> 
> In other words, if I have a central server computer with OOo on it, that 
> would be the "master" system that would do all the printing.  I want a way to 
> make sure a client can use OOo, in some way, from their desktop box, and be 
> sure that when they finish with a document and save it, the formatting will 
> stay exactly the same, with no changes in font size or anything, when it's 
> printed from the server.  (Also, some of their text will be replaced, for 
> instance [#Current Quarter#] may be replace with "Jan-March."  Since that 
> would change some formatting, it makes it even more critical that the image 
> of the document is the same on every system and it's also why I can't just 
> have a client print out a PDF file of the document instead of saving it as a 
> .odt file.)
> 
> I'll be glad to clarify any of these questions.  I think what I'm doing may 
> be kind of complex and I won't be surprised if I can do things in quite this 
> way, so I'm open to alternatives and suggestions.
> 
> 
> Thanks for any answers or help!
> 
> 
> 
> Hal
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@api.openoffice.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@api.openoffice.org

Reply via email to