On 10/29/10 1:35 PM, Frank Schönheit wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > >> exactly the links back into the DevGuide are useful at least from my >> point of view. > > Sure, I didn't say they aren't useful. The question is whether we should > evaluate how to replicate this functionality in doxygen. Using an > existing source code documentation tool, and enhancing it (via some > "plugins") to our special needs seems to be more reasonable than having > an own tool. > > Sure, it is well possible that there's no way to plug this into doxygen > - fine then. > i am totally with you. If possible and someone would provide a solution it's fine and we can easy repalce the existing mechanism.
> Still, for C++ documentation, I don't see a real benefit (feature- or > otherwise) of the current autodoc, compared with doxygen. +1, i see only advantages for doxygen Juergen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@api.openoffice.org
