> That's the point: not all of OOo is written in C++ anymore, there are > quite important subsystems written in Java. > > One premiere example is the scripting subsystem, which makes JavaScript, > BeanShell, ooRexx and others available to OOo. Removing Java removes all > these options and renders programs written in these languages useless. > > Another premiere example is the Java-API-interface to the entire OOo. > Removing Java removes the ability to use OOo from Java and to deploy all > Java applications that use OOo. > > Therefore the conclusion, that removing Java from OOo yields OOo to be > badly crippled. >
So people who need these features won't use LO. Where is the problem? -- Regards, Konstantin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
