Yep, there should have *Bearer* prefix when we use JWT. I'm not sure if it exists currently, if not, then it should be resolved as a bug.
Best Regards! @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://www.shaoyaoju.org/> Li Ling(Lien) <[email protected]> 于2020年1月6日周一 下午2:17写道： > yes , I think *Bearer* prefix is a standanr protocol > > Zhiyuan Ju <[email protected]> 于2020年1月6日周一 下午12:05写道： > > > > Hi, > > > > You mean there will have a *Bearer* prefix inside Authentication Header > > currently? > > > > Best Regards! > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://www.shaoyaoju.org/> > > > > > > Li Ling(Lien) <[email protected]> 于2020年1月6日周一 上午11:40写道： > > > > > Hi All, > > > We are transferring some of your server into APISIX platform,and I > > > like the JWT plugin,which can easily help us do Authentication. > > > > > > but when I try to deploy it, the JWT plugin doesn't work as I expected, > > > for now we use the Bearer Authentication( Oauth2.0 Bearer Token ). > > > which means that there is a `Bearer` prefix in the token value, > > > Do we need make Bearer Token compatiable inside APISIX? > > > >
