>````
>{error_msg: 'error message’}
>````
> >I think this style should be enough. >The `code` is meaningless, I do not 
> >like it. >The `code` is meaningless too. >most of case: >{ok = true} >{ok = 
> >false, error_msg = "xxxx"} >so we can drop `ok`, it is meaningless. 

What I'm trying to say is that if the business system is developed and online. 
The data format it defines is
```
{ok:false, errmsg:'error message'}
```
 And the client also does this logically. 
Thus, after using apisix processing, some error scenarios return
```
{error_msg: 'error message’}
```


For the client, this is the wrong message format. The client expects it to be 
in the format given above.
Shouldn't the gateway be able to adapt to different message formats? 


My example is json. What if the business system is not using json?
For example, if you use msgpack format, then you can easily adapt the message 
to msgpack format with response_format.

Reply via email to