I want to share the plan we are doing in the SkyWalking.
SkyWalking used to host doc in every repo, and we are going to keep this
way.
But also, at the same time, we know people want to read at the website, and
good for search engine.
So, our current ongoing plan to, generating docs on the website based on
repo's commit IDs.

A WIP PR is here, https://github.com/apache/skywalking-website/pull/215.


Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108


Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年2月14日周日 下午5:40写道:

> Hi, Kishani,
>
> Thanks for your continuous contribution to the Apache APISIX Website first.
>
> I would prefer the first solution, that put all docs in the apisix-website
> repository. Here are my concerns:
>
> 1. It's easier to maintain only one doc repository than multiples, no need
> to sync (no matter manually or automatically) from other repositories;
> 2. Yes, we could sync docs automatically from every project's repository of
> course, but we have to set up then obey some Doc Writing rules, file
> structure rules, and so on. Only in this way, we could have a universal
> feeling to read docs in `apisix.apache.org`. It's not easy to obey those
> rules in different repos.
> 3. Every project should have some basic and needed docs, like FAQ, README,
> but for more detailed docs, we could use the apisix-website repo to keep
> them.
>
> I would vote +1 for the first solution.
>
> Best Regards!
> @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
>
>
> kishani kandasamy <kishanik1...@gmail.com> 于2021年2月14日周日 下午3:26写道:
>
> > Hello community,
> > The Apache Apisix website is  getting updated by contributors .This
> > discussion  is for migrating  docs from other projects to the website.
> >
> > Here we have some options to do that.
> >
> > [1]. Move all docs to website, and remove all docs from origin repo;
> > [2]. Use some tools to auto sync docs from other repos, then there should
> > have a universal rule, or docs from different repo would not have a
> uniform
> > show style.
> >
> > Or there has some other ways?
> >
> > I would prefer the [1].
> > What do you think? Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kishani.
> >
>

Reply via email to