I agree! At the same time, I also think that HTTP Status code should be used instead of the logical code field.
Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年7月25日周日 下午3:29写道： > Hi, > > Any further discussion on this mail? I'm going to list all APIs and check > which part we should modify. > > Best Regards! > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan> > > > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年7月22日周四 下午2:47写道： > > > I would prefer relying on Status Code instead of `code` (actually it's a > > manual logical and extendable code). > > > > Why not list all API cases then have a choice? > > > > Best Regards! > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan> > > > > > > Ming Wen <wenm...@apache.org> 于2021年7月22日周四 下午12:36写道： > > > >> please give an example about i18n for a better understanding > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > >> Twitter: _WenMing > >> > >> > >> JunXu Chen <chenju...@apache.org> 于2021年7月22日周四 上午11:36写道： > >> > >> > Agree +1 > >> > > >> > > >> > I think we still need to keep the `code` field. > >> > > >> > The FE needs to implement i18n according to it. > >> > > >> > Unless `message` is semantic and can be used as a key of i18n. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 00:02, Ming Wen <wenm...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > > I don't think the `code` filed is useful, HTTP response code is > >> enough. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > >> > > Twitter: _WenMing > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Peter Zhu <sta...@apache.org> 于2021年7月21日周三 下午11:18写道： > >> > > > >> > > > Agree +1. > >> > > > And I think we should maintain the `code` filed and maintain the > >> doc of > >> > > > API. > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
