Don't be too optimistic about the generator. All from my understanding, those generated codes are making you easier to write a SDK, rather than not writing a SDK.
Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Chao Zhang <zchao1...@gmail.com> 于2021年9月26日周日 上午11:29写道： > > I prefer to generate only the types with the protobuf or the OpenAPI. > > Best regards > Chao Zhang > > https://github.com/tokers > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 11:24 AM 孙昊 <sunhao.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > No code generator can be perfect. You always need to modify something, so > > it's better not to use it. Machines cannot do better than humans, we can > > optimize the code, improve performance and so on. Therefore, I think that > > an official SDK cannot be generated by a code generator. This is a serious > > problem. > > > > Zeping Bai <bzp2...@apache.org>于2021年9月26日 周日上午11:21写道： > > > > > Yes, it seems that it supports protobuf generation[1] experimentally. But > > > I'm not sure if it can meet our needs. > > > > > > [1] https://openapi-generator.tech/docs/generators/protobuf-schema > > > > > > Chao Zhang <tok...@apache.org> 于2021年9月26日周日 上午11:12写道： > > > > > > > Can the OpenAPI help to generate protocol buffer types? Sometimes we > > > > may rely on it so that data can be transmitted with the gRPC protocol. > > > > Best regards > > > > Chao Zhang > > > > > > > > https://github.com/tokers > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 11:07 AM ZhengSong Tu <tzssanggl...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > if the SDK is generated by `openapi generator`, what is its form? code > > > or > > > > > jar? > > > > > > > > > > I think even if it was code, then as an SDK there would still be > > > > > things > > > > > like reading admin-keys, hosts etc from the config file that would > > > still > > > > > need to be written. > > > > > *ZhengSong Tu* > > > > > My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass > > > > > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zeping Bai <bzp2...@apache.org> 于2021年9月26日周日 上午9:51写道： > > > > > > > > > > > You may have misunderstood what I said about OpenAPI. In fact, we > > > > > > can > > > > > > directly generate a multilingual SDK through a definition file > > > > conforming > > > > > > to the OpenAPI specification and use the `openapi generator`[1] > > > > > > tool. > > > > > > Therefore, OpenAPI will be used as the cornerstone. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://openapi-generator.tech/docs/generators > > > > > > > > > > > > 孙昊 <sunhao.j...@gmail.com> 于2021年9月25日周六 下午11:23写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean: We must not only have the SDK, but also ensure the > > > > consistency > > > > > > and > > > > > > > correctness of the SDK and OpenAPI, and the most important thing > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > versatility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> 于2021年9月25日周六 下午11:05写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should not only own the java sdk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What does `should not` mean actually? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > > > > > > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 孙昊 <sunhao.j...@gmail.com> 于2021年9月25日周六 下午10:32写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > I think we should not only own the java sdk, we must also > > > > > > > standardize > > > > > > > > > it. In the future, we may also provide java sdk for spring and > > > > the > > > > > > > > starter > > > > > > > > > of spring boot, because more and more people are using the > > > > framework > > > > > > > > around > > > > > > > > > spring. Of course, SDKs in other languages cannot be > > > > > > > > > forgotten, > > > > such > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > JavaScript, Python, Go, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zeping Bai <bzp2...@apache.org> 于2021年9月25日周六 下午8:29写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I very much agree to provide the Admin API SDK, but I > > > > > > > > > > see > > > > that > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > only mentioned the Java language. In fact, I think if we can > > > > > > provide > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > OpenAPI (Swagger) [1] specification file, we can generate > > > > normal > > > > > > API > > > > > > > > > > documents and multi language SDKs with the help of OpenAPI > > > > > > generator > > > > > > > > > > tool [2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] OpenAPI Specification < > > > > https://swagger.io/resources/open-api/> > > > > > > > > > > [2] OpenAPITools/openapi-generator > > > > > > > > > > <https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 孙昊 <sunhao.j...@gmail.com> 于2021年9月25日周六 下午6:45写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > > If your team thinks my suggestion is reasonable, I am > > > > very > > > > > > > happy > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > assist you in this matter. I have used Java as the main > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > > > language for 10 years. > > > > > > > > > > > About the "mustake": > > > > > > > > > > > 1. When I want to use an API, I have to go to the > > > > official > > > > > > > > website of > > > > > > > > > > > apisix to find documentation. If we have a perfect > > > > > > > > > > > javadoc, > > > > we > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > solve > > > > > > > > > > > this problem greatly. > > > > > > > > > > > 2. It may be due to carelessness, wrong parameter > > > > > > > > > > > names > > > > and > > > > > > > wrong > > > > > > > > > > > types. This will cause a lot of trouble. But Java is > > > strongly > > > > > > > typed, > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > this type of problem can be avoided. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年9月25日周六 下午6:37写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good suggestion! Does anyone else also like this kind of > > > > SDK? > > > > > > If > > > > > > > > so, > > > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > > > > you like to take this project? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, may I know the details information about “mustake” > > > you > > > > > > mean? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 孙昊 <sunhao.j...@gmail.com>于2021年9月25日 周六下午6:27写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, everyone: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Our company now uses apisix as our api gateway, > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > our > > > > > > > main > > > > > > > > > > > > > development languages are Java and JavaScript. > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the process of using apisix, we often use the > > > > admin > > > > > > api > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > apisix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > We need to create and initiate requests repeatedly, > > > > which is > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > > > > > cumbersome, and sometimes, the parameter names, > > > parameter > > > > > > > types, > > > > > > > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > mistaken. So, I suggest that the apisix team can > > > release > > > > an > > > > > > SDK > > > > > > > > > > toolkit > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > Java, Types can be defined inside, because Java is > > > > strongly > > > > > > > > typed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good luck to everyone! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > 来自 琚致远 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > 发自移动版 Gmail
