> What about using the name `apisix-base` instead of `apisix-openresty`?
+1 for apisix-base

Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
Twitter: _WenMing


Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> 于2021年9月28日周二 下午3:38写道:

> What about using the name `apisix-base` instead of `apisix-openresty`?
>
> Joey Ma <majun...@apache.org> 于2021年9月27日周一 下午2:03写道:
> >
> > +1 on my side.
> > That sounds really great. Thanks.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:10 AM Ayush das <ayush24...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Sounds good to me
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Ayush Das<https://github.com/iamayushdas>
> > >
> > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 at 9:33 PM, Jintao Zhang <
> zhangjintao9...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 LGTM!
> > > >
> > > > ZhengSong Tu <tzssanggl...@gmail.com> 于2021年9月26日周日 下午7:54写道:
> > > >
> > > > > Good for me, +1
> > > > > *ZhengSong Tu*
> > > > > My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass
> > > > > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > wei jin <k...@apache.org> 于2021年9月26日周日 下午6:56写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi, community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The current APISIX image depends on the official version of
> > > openresty,
> > > > > but
> > > > > > APISIX needs to support more functions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For example, to integrate dubbo, you need to integrate
> > > > > > https://github.com/api7/mod_dubbo.
> > > > > > Or, some advanced features of APISIX, need to integrate
> > > > > > https://github.com/api7/ngx_multi_upstream_module and
> > > > > > https://github.com/api7/lua-var-nginx-module, and so on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All these basic modules do not change frequently and can be
> > > solidified
> > > > to
> > > > > > become a brand new openresty basic image (we can call it
> > > > > > `apisix-openresty`).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I propose to change the dockerfile under the
> `Apache/apisix-docker`
> > > > > > repository to integrate the apisix-openresty base image.
> > > > > > Of course, we need to provide the dockerfile of apisix-openresty
> > > > > > separately.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Welcome to discuss:
> > > > > > +1 I agree.
> > > > > > -1 I have something else to say.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to