> Does the implementation of this feature need to update APISIX? No, do not need to update APISIX.
I think the feature is useful, If we can configure `external name type service` in ApisixUpstream resource as a node of upstream object in APISIX，we can use `health check` feature between external services. Jintao Zhang <zhangjin...@apache.org> 于2022年3月21日周一 09:35写道： > I have seen some voices in the community, hoping that APISIX Ingress can > proxy external services e.g: [1], [2] > > For these two types of requirements, it is a relatively simple requirement > for [1], we only need to add the corresponding External name type service > to complete. > > But for [2], I found a very interesting situation. No other Ingress > controller implements similar functionality yet, and I think this would be > a huge feature. > > APISIX actually supports setting the domain name to nodes in the upstream. > But APISIX Ingress is not yet supported. > > To achieve the above function, we can set a special resolveGranularity to > directly convert the record of external name to Node. > > To achieve the above function, we can set a special resolveGranularity to > directly convert the record of external name to Node. > > > WDYT? > > > [1]: [ > > https://github.com/apache/apisix-ingress-controller/issues/813](https://github.com/apache/apisix-ingress-controller/issues/813) > > [2]: [ > > https://github.com/apache/apisix-ingress-controller/issues/645](https://github.com/apache/apisix-ingress-controller/issues/645) >
