> > No. So, what is the point of defining the same stupid thing
> > over and over?
>
> To keep Greg and Ryan happy, mostly :) I'm happy with the other
> changes they proposed, but that one seemed a little short sighted.
> But getting back to reality, it is pretty minor to fix later, and it
> is reasonable to wait until we have real breakage to solve.
>
> Sure, I think we'll end up with rules.mk or similar, but for now we
> have forward progress and no quibbling about a detail that can be
> fixed in half an hour once it becomes important.
Well, remember that the longer you continue this road, the
more time it will take you to make the switch. "Half an hour"
is quite an optimistic figure in this regard. ;-)
- Sascha
