On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 05:13:07PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote: > By the way, regarding the renaming of `apr_option_t': > > APR doesn't seem to be too careful with namespaces anyway
True, but "apr_option_t" is awfully generic. Options for what? Sockets? The type name has changed since this message :-), but I thought it would be nice to at least acknowledge your point about APR naming and to explain that I understood that, but the name was still a bit wonky. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
