[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> > As far as the current code to check for when to use SysV sems, I think
> > we should:
> > 
> > 1) change the test to check for the presence of semctl() or semop(),
> >    not the presence of union semun
> > 
> > 2) move the AC_IFALLYES() for USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE to a point *after*
> >    the fcntl() check since fcntl() is what we have used in the past on
> >    almost all platforms and IMHO we should keep using it except for
> >    platforms where we have specific information represented in hints.m4
> 
> This would be moving backwards.  This test was originally after the FCNTL
> test, but we moved it, I can't remember why.  Please look this up before
> making this change.

of course you're right about the order!

-- 
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
     http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
          Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Reply via email to