On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 02:54:33PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Index: Makefile.in > > > =================================================================== > > > -TARGETS= [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \ > > > - [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \ > > > +TARGETS= [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \ > > > > md5 (et. al.) are all moving to aprutil, correct? > > I would really prefer that we keep some way to encode passwords in > APR. This is a portability issue, so -1 (vote, not veto) for removing > md5 from APR.
I'm +1 on moving them to apr-util ... MD5 hashing is entirely portable. That is also where SHA-1 hashing is located. (the standard crypt() is generally non-portable and would remain in APR; that should solve Ryan's request for a way to hash [not encode] passwords) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
