> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'll buy this. I can see this being somewhat useful. Part of me thinks > > this should be implemented as a brigade_seek function. The calling code > > would then be responsible for calling ap_bucket_split and > > ap_brigade_split, but I am not sure if I agree with that or not yet. > > Except that you'd very likely end up seeking to the middle of a bucket, so > the seek > function would have to split that middle bucket for you anyway in order for > ap_brigade_split() to work, at which point we might as well have just gone > ahead and > split the whole brigade. Right?
Probably. As I said, I wasn't really sure what I thought of that idea. I guess it's not very good. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
