Replying to the correct address now. On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > 1. is sdbm an -internally- packaged function, as is mm? (my 2c says yes) > > If so, it has no business being distributed in > > httpd-2.0/include/apr-util, > > since we certainly wouldn't distribute mm.h either. Same goes with > > apu_config.h and apu_private.h. This means they don't belong in > > apr-util/include either. > > I have to agree with OtherBill here. SDBM should be an internal > package. We have already admitted that it is only to be used as a > last-resort package. > > > 2. aprs are driving me nuts. Either we use src/ folders around the sources, > > or we don't. Consistency is all I'm asking. > > Personally, -0 for using src. > > > I'll fix either if we agree on how, but I would end up breaking the build. > > Perhaps someone on Unix/libtool could do so, and I'll clean up the win32 > > asap. > > If we agree on any of this, I'll fix the Unix builds. > > Ryan > _______________________________________________________________________________ > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 406 29th St. > San Francisco, CA 94131 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
