On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 04:29:31PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:01 PM > > > > I had no idea that we didn't even ship them, though! That doesn't feel quite > > right to me. No opinion on Apache, but on APRUTIL, I'd like to see that > > testdbm gets shipped because it is actually a nice little tool for creating > > and inspecting *DBM files. > > nak ... we have always had a policy of pulling all test/ directories from > any tarball or binaries build.
Like I said: new news to me :-) I'll tinker with Apache and APRUTIL to fix this. Somebody had added test to Apache, then I nuked it thinking "woah, we don't build anything in there, so don't recurse." Then I realized that we wanted to *clean* the test directories, so I put test back into Apache and added it to APRUTIL :-) Time to go do it the Right Way. I'll leave a turd in STATUS about this. > However, I don't see an issue with creating a util/ directory that has thing > like you describe - small bits of useful code that help the user with the > package. Or just call it support/ in keeping with httpd's structure. I'd call it util/ since it isn't supporting anything :-), but would be okay with support/ if people leaned in that direction more. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
