"David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This was suggested by Carlos Hasan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] but as I'm not > overly familiar with the hashing code I'm putting it forward rather than > committing it :)
Did he offer any particular justification for the change? :-) I'm not saying it's bad or good, just have no idea why the change is suggested or how it affects performance. -K > Index: tables/apr_hash.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/tables/apr_hash.c,v > retrieving revision 1.9 > diff -u -r1.9 apr_hash.c > --- tables/apr_hash.c 2000/11/08 00:54:23 1.9 > +++ tables/apr_hash.c 2001/01/02 01:30:14 > @@ -255,8 +255,9 @@ > */ > hash = 0; > for (p = key, i = klen; i; i--, p++) > - hash = hash * 33 + *p; > + hash += (hash << 5) + *p; > + > /* scan linked list */ > for (hep = &ht->array[hash & ht->max], he = *hep; > he;
