From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 9:08 AM
> From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:27 AM
> >
> > We should simply nuke the "asize" and "csize" since they are nearly
> > impossible to deal with in any reasonable cross-platform way. If/when
> > somebody really needs that feature, then we can introduce them.
>
> I'm +.5 on retaining asize, simply becase I believe asize is inadaquately
> defined. I'm strongly +1 on retaining csize, which has a very definate and
> legitimate purpose for file management.
Reconsidering asize, let's drop it, and add it with an adequate definition
later.
On csize, the argument goes like this for Apache;
proxy file retention weight = csize * age
while (totalcached > wantcached) {
read greatest retention weight
rm file
}
Something that is far less effective using the 'true' size.
Bill
