Okay, people. Here is your chance to vote.
add 2.0 symbol renames to ap*_compat.h:
-0: Greg, Doug
I had thought somebody cared, but if not, then I'm going to close this
issue, and toss out the ap_xml -> apr_xml renames that I included.
Cheers,
-g
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 06:28:46PM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > Yes, I was thinking the 2.0 names. Personally, I don't care about them at
> > all. I'd just as soon not worry about compat names for them, but was under
> > the impression that other people wanted API consistency with our previous
> > 2.0 alpha releases.
>
> it would be easy to generate one, but everybody seemed ok with running the
> apr_rename.pl script on their project trees. i was under the impression
> we did not want compat foo for anything other than 1.3.x names, at least
> not in the cvs tree.
>
> > > btw, i missed one apr_clear_pool -> apr_pool_clear, ok to make that
> > > change?
> >
> > Of course :-)
>
> done.
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
