On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote: > I don't like how we detect whether DSO support should be enabled by > testing for the possible implementation methods, and then rather than > remembering which we found, we have all this #if THIS_OS crap all over > dso/unix/dso.c. If we found dlfcn or shl or whatever, that should be > what we conditionalize on, and maybe have per-OS mangling for the > variant dlopen() hoo-hah out there. > > So here is a patch to define macros for the found support for dynamic > loading. I imagine that I picked stupid names for the macros, and would > welcome a correction. Otherwise, this seem OK?
+1. The old code was lifted out of 1.3 directly. This is much easier to understand. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
