On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> wait a sec, i am blind. apr_threadkey_private_{get,set} does what i
> expected. its apr_threadkey_data_{get,set} that uses
> apr_pool_userdata_{get,set}. this part of the api should probably be
> removed.
Why would you remove that part of the API? It is just as useful or
useless as the rest of the userdata_{get,set} functions, isn't it? Maybe
not, because threadkey's are basically the same thing. Whatever, no real
opinion here.
:-)
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
