On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:35:24AM +0100, David Reid wrote: > OK, in an effort at moving things along these names are much shorter. > > apr_sms_t > > apr_sms_create > apr_sms_reset > apr_sms_destroy > apr_sms_threadsafe_lock > apr_sms_threadsafe_unlock > apr_sms_is_ancestor > apr_sms_cleanup_register > apr_sms_cleanup_unregister > > apr_std_sms_create > apr_tracking_sms_create apr_sms_std_create apr_sms_tracking_create
[clearer hierarchy. 4 months ago there was a mad-perl-script hack-against-the-code to turn all names around :) ] > apr_malloc > apr_realloc > apr_free sure about this? [not that it bothers me, one way or the other] > Well, thoughts? like.
