On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:52:29AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > My opinion is that expat should not be included in apr-util > > because it is not dependent on apr or apr-util. It should be > > a --with-expat option instead. > > Let me make sure I understand you. Are you saying > > 1) don't ship expat source code with apr-util... > > if you have expat on your system maybe we'll find it and otherwise > you can point to it with --with-expat > > if you don't have expat on your system, then apr-util won't expose > the apr_xml wrappers and mod_dav won't build either > > or simply > > 2) keep the expat objects out of libaprutil.la; then, our existing > logic to look for a previously-installed expat, or a new > --with-expat option, can put your previously-installed libexpat.la > in APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS instead of building our own copy and putting > that libexpat.la in APRUTIL_EXPORT_LIBS
I meant (1), but I've committed something that will do (2) because I'm too lazy to move it out of apr-util. ....Roy
