Just one objection... this list from apr/renames_pending: apr_file_lstat from apr_lstat apr_file_stat from apr_stat
apr_fnmatch_found from apr_is_fnmatch apr_groupname_get from apr_get_groupname apr_user_path_get from apr_get_home_directory apr_user_id_get from apr_get_userid apr_user_name_get from apr_get_username apr_time_ctime_fmt from apr_ctime apr_time_os_explode_get from apr_os_exp_time_get apr_time_os_explode_put from apr_os_exp_time_put apr_time_os_get from apr_os_imp_time_get apr_time_os_put from apr_os_imp_time_put apr_time_ansi_put from apr_ansi_time_to_apr_time apr_time_explode_gmt from apr_explode_gmt apr_time_explode_lt from apr_explode_localtime apr_time_implode from apr_implode_time I've changed just a few in this note that seem more sensical at the moment. I'd like to apply in an hour or two since we've had no objections. However, if you have a better name within our schema, please yell. I'll commit in two hours unless anyone objects, incorporating anyone's 'better suggestions'. Would be nice to have the API closer to a 'final form' for this beta. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:16 AM Subject: Tagging Apache 2.0 for beta candidate > I think we have a good shot at a beta candidate. I plan to tag the tree > early this afternoon (ET) unless I hear objections. > > Bill > >
