On Sat, 19 May 2001, Ben Laurie wrote: > > Just to verify (haven't looked at this section of the code itself yet), > > assignment IS what's intended here, right? If so, a ((foo = bar) != NULL) > > might make that more clear. > > Good point. I foolishly assumed the assignment was intentional - it > still looks like it is, but confirmation from someone who knows would be > good. I agree with != NULL if it is so.
Looking closer, I agree. Confirmation would still be nice, but I agree that it looks intentional. So I'll go ahead and throw a !=NULL in there. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
