On this topic... note that the new SMS stuff has a bunch of argument checking, too. All that needs to be yanked, too.
Cheers, -g On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 11:35:30AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:25:18PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Justin, I'm sorry I didn't see this before. > > > > yuck! > > Okay, I'll back out the EINVAL stuff. Yeah, I thought it was hokey. > Sorry. I was more interested in the apr_md4/apr_md5 call and didn't > pay attention to the other stuff. I'll do better next time. =) > > IIRC, the standing APR policy is to segfault in this case. Actually, > I'll back out in a few hours (when I get back from class) to give > others a chance to comment on this. If we were consistent, APR_EINVAL > makes some sort of sense, but I don't think that we do this anywhere > else. So, yeah, we should back this out. -- justin -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
