Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why were the apr_file_printf switched to printf? printf isn't portable
> or even supported by APR (so says Ryan). I'd rather we ate our own dog
> food here. -- justin
[f]printf not portable? huh?
How does the level of printf support in APR affect whether or not a
program which uses APR can use printf?
Note that we rely on APR-provided format strings to be compatible with
printf format strings whenever possible so that gcc can keep us honest.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
