On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Sander Striker wrote: > Oh, yes, I actually want to do s/mem_sys/sms/ aswell, but that can
I'm hoping that includes the foo_mem_sys's that are in the apr_sms_t structure? "sms->parent_mem_sys" etc seems both redunant and too much typing. "sms->parent" would be ideal, but then again "sms->ref" wouldn't make much sense, so for consistency I could live with "sms->parent_sms". =-) PS: If this post makes no sense, please tell me. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
