From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:59 AM
> Spent a bit of time reviewing the thread and I still think the Samba team > proposal looks > very worthwhile (and it scratches a couple of itches for me :-). The NAL > enables an > architecturally clean solution to a whole class of problems. +1 on > implementing against > the API posted by Sander. I expect we will tweak things as we begin to use > the API but it > is an excellent start. And I agree with the concensus that we not commit code > untill after > Apache 2.0 is released. You misssed it :-) Commit code to apr. That's not the issue. Until we can prove an overwhelming requirement, and begin Apache 2.1 tree developement, simply _don't__use__the__code__in__httpd_. That's all I'm asking. If this is a useful library, we will introduce things. Perhaps we need to keep in STATUS a list of 'release' features, 'beta' features, and 'under development-experimental' features. So parts of apr and apr-util can evolve, but avoid pi$$ing people off that we keep 'breaking' it. Just a suggestion, any comments? Bill
