On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:26:49AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: >... > [side note: I just saw Ian's post, and he has some good examples of cases > where you could end up with lots of buckets at a time. I'm not sure about > the subrequests example, because each subrequest would get handled one at > a time, its buckets being dumped out to the network and the buckets freed, > generally. But it could happen, I guess.]
The subrequests are dumped to the filter stack. Not necessarily the network. It is *very* reasonable to assume that the C-L filter is sitting in there, holding onto the entire response. (e.g. an HTTP/1.0 request with keepalives) The C-L filter is exactly why we have setaside(pool). The CORE filter won't ever need to bother setting aside a 10 byte file, but the C-L filter will set aside everything, large or small. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
