On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:55:15PM +0200, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > i was wondering. might it be better to put real functionality > behind srvsvcd? after all, what you are describing is srvsvcd's > job. > > srvsvcd's job is also to handle the dependencies for service startup.
a follow-up correction so as not to confuse more people than i have already: svcctld - an implementation of \PIPE\svcctl - not srvsvcd. my mistake. luke [p.s apr people: recognise the pipe name convention? :) :)]
