On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:20:31AM +0100, David Reid wrote: > > Ian Holsman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > On 29 Jun 2001 11:53:47 -0700, Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 10:28:46AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > >>> I guess I'd see what Subversion does - do they > > >>> require an "installed" APR, or do they ask for the location of the > > >>> source? -- justin > > >>> > > >> Subversion requires apr source to be present in subversion/apr. > > Why? If we have shared libraries available can't it just use those? I mean > at present I'm not sure apache can, so this whole area needs some looking at > yet. Not yet unfortunately, although this is planned once apr stabilizes a bit. It is mostly to ensure that when people cvs up subversion, they get apr up to date as well. > > If you're building subversion on the same system as apache can you tell > either apache or subversion where to look for the source? ISTR this is > something we've talked about for apache before now. AFAIK not done anything > about it yet. > Likewise not yet, which is a real pain since the subversion server actually requires apache 2.0.
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kevin Pilch-Bisson http://www.pilch-bisson.net "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pgpNBirzIphrX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
