On 07 Jul 2001 00:27:03 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 08:24:17AM +0100, David Reid wrote: > > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:42:24AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > BTW, do we still need to add the @deffunc lines as we don't seem to > > > > have been doing in some places. Is this a scandoc change Ben? > > > > > > Ben's gone on record saying we don't use scandoc anymore, but doxygen. > > > (Check [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives around Jun 9th and 10th.) > > > > > > Go figure. No one else seems to be aware of that. =) -- justin > > > > Ah yes, I meant doxygen not scandoc... That's what you get for being up > > all night again :)
BTW... I have a nightly job which runs doxygen on the httpd tree.. available on docx.webperf.org > > > > Maybe Ben would be so kind as to answer this once and for all? > > Based on what Ben said in that earlier thread, doxygen doesn't use > @deffunc (only scandoc does). No one has had the time to yank out > all of those @deffunc lines with a perl script. Any perl hackers > out there? -- justin -- Ian Holsman Performance Measurement & Analysis CNET Networks - 415 364-8608
