On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 02:31:35AM +0100, David Reid wrote: > To be honest changing sms_trivial to use malloc instead of apr_sms_malloc is > an easy move (just a few lines to change) so it's probably worth trying and > then seeing what we get... > > BTW, I'm impressed by the amount of traffic this has generated. Exactly > what I hoped it would do! > > I guess also I'm wondering if we should apply my patch. For all the reasons > given it's not ideal, but it's a starting point, and if in 2 weeks it looks > totally different, well, no bother, but at least it lets everyone work on it > with a minimum of fuss... Opinions? 3 +1's and I'll commit while I'm in > Pheonix (got a nice connection)
+1 after 2.0.20 is rolled. -- justin
