From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 3:03 PM > > I'm all for a new apr-ldap CVS module / library. But its presence in APRUTIL > feels very questionable to me.
++1 I've hesitated to speak out of my a$$, for lack of a more tactful way to put it, but I have huge portability concerns and no time to review this code so I know to what I'm speaking. But to roll something this large into the apr-util lib (lightweight, portable and widely useful bits of goodness) just seems to be asking for headaches. apr-util should be stable right out the door ... is this ldap code likely to evolve significantly over time? Just my 2c. Bill
