On Monday 03 September 2001 22:06, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > Adding that API to the thread locks API that is already there is making > > the code harder to read. If you split it out, then you can re-post the > > entire patch in two pieces. One, the current API re-org, which can be > > generated by just doing a CVS diff. The other the condition variable > > API, which can be done by just posting the files with the API to the > > list. > > Are you proposing I do something like apr_cond.h and apr_rwlock.h, leaving > apr_thread_mutex_t and apr_proc_mutex_t in apr_lock.h? That may make this > whole process much easier to digest.
Yeah, that is a good idea too. That header file has always been too hard to read as well. We could just include both of them from apr_lock.h if we wanted. Not saying we should initially, but it would be possible. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
