Oops. Sorry about that... I may not have had testprocmutex.c in my working
copy when I did the patch. I had searched everywhere for it; maybe this test
was added after my change?
Ah well. Thanks for patching it, Ryan.
Cheers,
-g
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 03:59:57AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rbb 01/09/23 20:59:57
>
> Modified: test testprocmutex.c
> Log:
> Cleanup some warnings.
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.2 +4 -4 apr/test/testprocmutex.c
>
> Index: testprocmutex.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/test/testprocmutex.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
> --- testprocmutex.c 2001/09/19 20:08:05 1.1
> +++ testprocmutex.c 2001/09/24 03:59:57 1.2
> @@ -126,10 +126,10 @@
> printf("OK\n");
>
> printf("%-60s", " Waiting for processes to exit");
> - s1 = apr_proc_wait(p1, APR_WAIT);
> - s2 = apr_proc_wait(p2, APR_WAIT);
> - s3 = apr_proc_wait(p3, APR_WAIT);
> - s4 = apr_proc_wait(p4, APR_WAIT);
> + s1 = apr_proc_wait(p1, NULL, APR_WAIT);
> + s2 = apr_proc_wait(p2, NULL, APR_WAIT);
> + s3 = apr_proc_wait(p3, NULL, APR_WAIT);
> + s4 = apr_proc_wait(p4, NULL, APR_WAIT);
> printf("OK\n");
>
> if ((*x) != MAX_COUNTER) {
>
>
>
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
