> > And, in discussions with Roy, I think he was thinking a client
> > library should be a part of httpd not APR. But, I don't care
> > one way or another. -- justin
>
> Nah. This has utility outside of httpd. Specifically, Subversion is an
> excellent candidate. I also know that Covalent has a similar library that
> they use internally ("apua", I believe). So that is candidate #2. And then
> you have your flood program for candidate #3. Of course, mod_proxy would use
> it, but that can fall under Roy's httpd placement model.
>
> And then there are the ones we don't know about...
All the more reason why it shouldn't be part of the Apache Portable Runtime
project. If you want to create a new project for it, that's fine with me,
but the only thing it has in common with APR is that it will use APR.
....Roy
