On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:34:37PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > This is what I was alluding to in my absurdly vague message early on in > > this thread. What I failed to realize at the time was that we don't have > > a good way of getting that pool/freelist pointer deep into our filter > > APIs. Am I looking at this correctly now? > > Yup. The only thing I can think of is adding a "bucket_freelist" > parameter to ap_new_connection - this would be similar to the ptrans > pool (but not cleared like ptrans at the end of the connection). > Then, use f->c->bucket_freelist as the parameter to the bucket_create > functions.
Exactly what I've been suggesting all along. (FirstBill, GregA, Jeff, David and I racked our brains over this almost four months ago now and this was the best option we could come up with... I'm still convinced it's the best way to go.) --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
