> > Implement portable accessors for proc mutex. These are equivalent to > > apr_os_lock_get/set, but they work for apr_proc_mutex_t types instead. > > > > I did my best to implement these on non-Unix platforms from how I saw > > them implemented for apr_os_lock_get/set, but on those platforms they > > are untested. > > Well, this actually breaks things on OS/2 (& probably Win32), not because > there's anything wrong with it but because proc mutexes aren't yet > implemented on either platform so there's no os handle in the > apr_proc_mutex_t to get/set.
Hmm.. Should I #ifdef them out for now? > I guess I should actually implement them, so are they supposed to be like > APR_LOCKALL or APR_CROSS_PROCESS locks? APR_CROSS_PROCESS == apr_proc_mutex_t We don't have an analog for APR_LOCKALL, and it is still undecided if we need/want one. -aaron
